Reporting entities must designate an individual as the AML/CTF compliance officer for the reporting entity
26J Reporting entities must designate an individual as the AML/CTF compliance officer for the reporting entity
The reporting entity must designate an individual as the compliance officer (the AML/CTF compliance officer) for the reporting entity.
AML/CTF compliance officers must have sufficient authority etc.
A reporting entity must ensure that the individual designated as the AML/CTF compliance officer for the reporting entity:
is a person employed or otherwise engaged by the reporting entity at management level; and
has sufficient authority, independence and access to resources and information to ensure the individual can perform the functions of an AML/CTF compliance officer effectively.
AML/CTF compliance officers must meet certain requirements
An individual is not eligible to be designated as the AML/CTF compliance officer for a reporting entity unless the individual:
if the reporting entity provides its designated services at or through a permanent establishment of the reporting entity in Australia—is a resident of Australia; and
is a fit and proper person; and
meets the requirements (if any) specified in the AML/CTF Rules.
The AML/CTF Rules may specify matters to which a reporting entity must have regard in determining whether an individual is a fit and proper person for the purposes of paragraph (3)(b).
Civil penalties
Subsection (2) is a civil penalty provision.
A reporting entity contravenes this subsection if:
the reporting entity designates an individual as its AML/CTF compliance officer; and
the individual is not eligible under subsection (3) to be designated as the AML/CTF compliance officer for the reporting entity.
Subsection (6) is a civil penalty provision.
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.