Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979

A person commits an offence if:

the person is, or has been, an entrusted person; and

the person has obtained a record in the person’s capacity as an entrusted person; and

the record:

was acquired or prepared by or on behalf of the Organisation in connection with its functions; or

relates to the performance by the Organisation of its functions; and

the person engages in any of the following conduct (the relevant conduct):

copying the record;

transcribing the record;

retaining the record;

removing the record;

dealing with the record in any other manner; and

the relevant conduct was not engaged in by the person:

as an ASIO employee in the course of the person’s duties as an ASIO employee; or

as an ASIO affiliate in accordance with the contract, agreement or other arrangement under which the person is performing functions or services for the Organisation; or

in accordance with a contract, agreement or arrangement the person has entered into with ASIO (other than as an ASIO affiliate); or

acting within the limits of authority conferred on the person by the Director‑General; or

with the approval of the Director‑General, or of a person having the authority of the Director‑General to give such an approval.

Subsection (1) does not apply to a record that has already been communicated or made available to the public with the authority of the Commonwealth.

A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code).

Subsection (1) does not apply if the person deals with the record for the purpose of an IGIS official exercising a power, or performing a function or duty, as an IGIS official.

A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2A) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code).

Subsection (4) applies if, in a prosecution for an offence (the prosecuted offence) against subsection (1), the trier of fact:

is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the prosecuted offence; but

is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence against subsection 18B(1) (the alternative offence).

The trier of fact may find the defendant not guilty of the prosecuted offence but guilty of the alternative offence, so long as the defendant has been accorded procedural fairness in relation to that finding of guilt.

In this section:

For the definition of document, see section 2B of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.