Offence for breaches without approval
66 Offence for breaches without approval
If:
a transaction takes place that places a person in breach of a provision of Division 2 or 3; and
the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that a result of the transaction would be to place the person in breach of a provision of Division 2 or 3; and
the person was a party to the transaction or was in a position to prevent the transaction taking place; and
the ACMA has not approved the breach under section 67;
the person commits an offence.
Penalty:
if the breach relates to a commercial television broadcasting licence—20,000 penalty units; or
if the breach relates to a commercial radio broadcasting licence—2,000 penalty units.
In a prosecution for an offence against subsection (1), it is not necessary to prove that the defendant knew that the provision breached was a provision of Division 2 or 3.
A person who breaches subsection (1) commits a separate offence in respect of each day (including a day of a conviction under this subsection or any subsequent day) during which the breach of Division 2 or 3 continues.
A prosecution for an offence under this section against a person in relation to a transaction cannot be commenced if the ACMA has given the person a notice under section 70 in relation to the transaction and the time for compliance with the notice has not expired.
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.