Corporations Act 2001

A person (the defendant) contravenes this subsection if:

an audit company engages in audit activity in relation to an audited body at a particular time; and

a conflict of interest situation exists in relation to the audited body at that time; and

the defendant is a director of the audit company at that time; and

the defendant is or becomes aware of the circumstances referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b); and

the defendant does not, as soon as possible after the defendant becomes aware of those circumstances, take reasonable steps to ensure that the conflict of interest situation ceases to exist.

For conflict of interest situation, see section 324CD.

The audit company itself will commit an offence based on the contravention of subsection 324AA(1).

A person (the defendant) contravenes this subsection if:

an audit company is the auditor of an audited body; and

a conflict of interest situation exists in relation to the audited body while the audit company is the auditor of the audited body; and

the defendant is a director of the audit company at a time when the conflict of interest situation exists; and

on a particular day (the start day), the defendant becomes aware of the circumstances referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b); and

at the end of the period of 7 days from the start day:

the conflict of interest situation remains in existence; and

ASIC has not been informed in writing by the defendant, by another director of the audit company or by the audit company that the conflict of interest situation exists.

For conflict of interest situation, see section 324CD.

If the audited body is a public company, a registered scheme or a registrable superannuation entity, the audit appointment will be terminated at the end of the period of 21 days (or a longer period that has been approved by ASIC) from the day a notice under this subsection is given if the notice is not followed up by a notice under:

subsection 327B(2C) (public company); or

subsection 328E(5) (public company with crowd‑sourced funding); or

subsection 331AAA(2C) (registered scheme); or

subsection 331AH(5) (registrable superannuation entity).

A person is not excused from informing ASIC under subsection (1A) that a conflict of interest situation exists on the ground that the information might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty.

However, if the person is a natural person:

the information; and

the giving of the information;

If ASIC is given a notice under paragraph (1A)(e), ASIC must, as soon as practicable after the notice is received, give a copy of the notice to the audited body.

A person contravenes this subsection if:

an audit company engages in audit activity in relation to an audited body at a particular time; and

a conflict of interest situation exists in relation to the audited body at the time; and

the person is a director of the audit company at that time; and

at that time, another director of the audit company is aware that the conflict of interest situation exists; and

the audit company does not, as soon as possible after the director referred to in paragraph (d) becomes aware that the conflict of interest situation exists, take all reasonable steps to ensure that the conflict of interest situation ceases to exist.

For conflict of interest situation, see section 324CD.

The company itself will commit an offence based on the contravention of subsection 324AA(1).

For the purposes of an offence based on subsection (2), strict liability applies to the physical elements of the offence specified in paragraphs (2)(a), (b), (d) and (e).

For strict liability, see section 6.1 of the Criminal Code.

Subsection (6) provides a defence.

A person contravenes this subsection if:

an audit company engages in audit activity in relation to an audited body at a particular time; and

a conflict of interest situation exists in relation to the audited body at the time; and

the person is a director of the audit company at that time; and

at that time none of the directors of the audit company is aware that the conflict of interest situation exists; and

a director of the audit company would have been aware of the existence of the conflict of interest situation if the audit company had in place a quality control system reasonably capable of making the audit company aware of the existence of such a conflict of interest situation.

For conflict of interest situation, see section 324CD.

The company itself will commit an offence based on the contravention of subsection 324AA(2).

For the purposes of an offence based on subsection (4), strict liability applies to the physical elements of the offence specified in paragraphs (4)(a), (b), (d) and (e).

For strict liability, see section 6.1 of the Criminal Code.

Subsection (6) provides a defence.

A person does not commit an offence because of a contravention of subsection (2) or (4) in relation to audit activity engaged in by an audit company at a particular time if the person has reasonable grounds to believe that the audit company had in place at that time a quality control system that provided reasonable assurance (taking into account the size and nature of the audit practice of the audit company) that the audit company and its employees complied with the requirements of this Subdivision.

A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in this subsection, see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code.

The obligations imposed by this section are in addition to, and do not derogate from, any obligation imposed by:

another provision of this Act; or

a code of professional conduct.

Paragraph (a)—see, for example, the specific obligations imposed by Subdivision B.