Importing substances represented to be serious drug alternatives
320.3 Importing substances represented to be serious drug alternatives
A person commits an offence if:
the person imports a substance; and
at the time of the importation, the presentation of the substance includes an express or implied representation that the substance is a serious drug alternative.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years, or 120 penalty units, or both.
For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), the presentation of a substance includes, but is not limited to, matters relating to:
the name of the substance; and
the labelling and packaging of the substance and
any advertising or other informational material associated with the substance.
This section does not apply to a substance if it is:
food (within the meaning of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991) for which:
there is a standard (within the meaning of that Act); or
in the form in which the substance is presented, there is a tradition in Australia and New Zealand of using the substance as food for humans; or
goods that are listed goods, or registered goods, within the meaning of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989; or
therapeutic goods that are:
exempt goods (within the meaning of that Act); or
exempt under section 18A of that Act; or
the subject of an approval or authority under section 19 of that Act; or
the subject of an approval under section 19A of that Act; or
a substance or mixture of substances that is a chemical product (within the meaning of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code set out in the Schedule to the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994), and that:
is a registered chemical product (within the meaning of that Code); or
is a reserved chemical product (within the meaning of that Code); or
is an exempt chemical product (within the meaning of subsection 69B(2) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992); or
is imported into Australia with the written consent of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority under subsection 69B(1B) of that Act; or
a substance or mixture of substances that is an active constituent (within the meaning of that Code) for a proposed or existing chemical product (within the meaning of that Code), and that:
is an approved active constituent (within the meaning of that Code); or
is an exempt active constituent (within the meaning of subsection 69B(2) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992); or
is imported into Australia with the written consent of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority under subsection 69B(1B) of that Act; or
prescribed by, or included in a class of substances prescribed by, the regulations.
A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in this subsection (see subsection 13.3(3)).
In a prosecution for an offence under subsection (1), it is not necessary to prove that:
the representation of the substance to be a serious drug alternative related to a particular serious drug; or
the defendant intended to cause any person to believe that the substance:
was a particular serious drug; or
has a psychoactive effect that is the same as or similar to a particular serious drug; or
is a lawful alternative to a particular serious drug; or
the defendant knew, or was reckless as to:
the particular identity of the substance, or
whether the substance has a particular psychoactive effect.
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.