Experimental proof as evidence
34.50 Experimental proof as evidence
If a party (the proponent) proposes to tender, as evidence in a proceeding, experimental proof of a fact, the proponent must apply for orders in relation to the experimental proof, including orders about any of the following:
the service on other parties of particulars of the experiment and of each fact that the proponent asserts is, will or may be proved by the experiment;
any persons who must be permitted to attend the conduct of the experiment;
the time when, and the place where, the experiment must be conducted;
the means by which the conduct and results of the experiment must be recorded;
the time by which any other party (the opponent) must notify the proponent of any grounds on which the opponent will contend that the experiment does not prove a fact that the proponent asserts is, will or may be proved by the experiment.
Evidence of the conduct and results of the experiment is admissible in the proceeding, only:
if the proponent has complied with subrule (1) and any orders given under that subrule; or
with the leave of the Court.
If an order mentioned in paragraph (1)(e) has been made, and the opponent has not complied with the order in relation to a ground, the opponent may rely on the ground only with the leave of the Court.
Rules 34.51–34.60 left blank
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.