Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards Act 2012

A person must not supply, or offer to supply, a GEMS product if:

the product is in a product class covered by a GEMS determination; and

either or both of the following apply:

the product does not comply with a requirement of the GEMS determination;

a requirement of the GEMS determination is not complied with in supplying, or offering to supply, the product.

Subsection (1) does not apply if:

the product is a second‑hand product at the time of the supply or offer; or

the following conditions are satisfied:

the model of the product is exempt under section 37 from the requirement;

any conditions of the exemption (see subsection 37(2)) are complied with in connection with the supply or offer; or

the following conditions are satisfied:

the product is imported into, or the product’s last process of manufacture is performed in, Australia at a time (the earlier time) before the GEMS determination comes into force;

if there is a limited grandfathering period under the GEMS determination for the product class (see section 31)—the supply or offer occurs before the end of that period;

all transitional GEMS labelling requirements of the GEMS determination are complied with in supplying or offering to supply the product;

the product currently complies with any pre‑existing GEMS determination that was in force at the earlier time;

if there was no such pre‑existing GEMS determination—the supply of the product (or an offer to supply the product) in a State or Territory at the earlier time would not have contravened a law of the State or Territory relating to energy use by products, or greenhouse gases resulting from operating products.

A person commits an offence of strict liability if the person contravenes subsection (1) and the product is a category A product for the product class.

For offences of strict liability, see subsection 6.1(1) of the Criminal Code.

See subsection (7) (evidential burden for matters in subsection (2)).

A person commits an offence of strict liability if the person contravenes subsection (1) and the product is a category B product for the product class.

For offences of strict liability, see subsection 6.1(1) of the Criminal Code.

See subsection (7) (evidential burden for matters in subsection (2)).

A person is liable to a civil penalty if the person contravenes subsection (1) and the product is a category A product for the product class.

It is generally not necessary to prove a person’s state of mind in proceedings for a contravention of a civil penalty provision (see section 94 of the Regulatory Powers Act).

See subsection (8) (evidential burden for matters in subsection (2)).

A person is liable to a civil penalty if the person contravenes subsection (1) and the product is a category B product for the product class.

It is generally not necessary to prove a person’s state of mind in proceedings for a contravention of a civil penalty provision (see section 94 of the Regulatory Powers Act).

See subsection (8) (evidential burden for matters in subsection (2)).

In a prosecution for an offence against subsection (3) or (4), the prosecution bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in paragraphs (2)(b) and (c), despite subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code.

However, a defendant still bears an evidential burden in relation to a matter in paragraph (2)(a), because subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code still applies in relation to that paragraph.

In proceedings for a civil penalty order under the Regulatory Powers Act for a contravention of subsection (5) or (6):

a person who wishes to rely on paragraph (2)(a) bears an evidential burden in relation to a matter in that paragraph; and

the person applying for the order bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in paragraphs (2)(b) and (c).