Surveillance Devices Act 2004

any warrant issued under that Division and in force immediately before the day of that repeal remains in force, according to its terms, after that day as if that Division had not been repealed; and

any consent by a Judge of a court created by the Parliament to be nominated by the Minister under subsection 12D(2) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979, being a consent that is in force immediately before the day of that repeal, is to be treated, with effect from that day, as if it were a consent to be declared by the Minister to be an eligible Judge under subsection 12(3) of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004; and

any nomination by the Minister of a Judge of a court created by the Parliament as a Judge who may issue warrants under section 12G of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979, being a nomination that was in force immediately before the day of that repeal, is to be treated, with effect from that day, as if it were a nomination of that Judge as an eligible Judge for the purposes of section 12 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004; and

any nomination by the Minister of a person holding an appointment referred to in subsection 12DA(1) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979, being a nomination that was in force immediately before the day of that repeal, is taken, with effect from that day, to be a nomination of that person for the purposes of section 13 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004.

the Division had not been repealed; and

the definitions of class 1 general offence and class 2 general offence and the definition of general offence were limited to offences against the law of the Australian Capital Territory; and

for the purposes of the continued operation of section 12L of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979:

sections 219F to 219K of the Customs Act 1901 had not been repealed; and

references in section 12L of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 to general offences, class 1 general offences or class 2 general offences were to be construed as if limited to offences against the law of the Australian Capital Territory.

any warrant issued under that Division and in force immediately before the day of that repeal remains in force, according to its terms, after that day as if that Division had not been repealed; and

any consent by a Judge of a court created by the Parliament to be nominated by the Minister under subsection 219AA(1) of the Customs Act 1901, being a consent that is in force immediately before the day of that repeal, is to be treated, with effect from that day, as if it were a consent to be declared by the Minister to be an eligible Judge under subsection 12(3) of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004; and

any nomination by the Minister of a Judge of a court created by the Parliament as a Judge who may issue warrants under that Division, being a nomination that was in force immediately before the day of that repeal, is to be treated, with effect from that day, as if it were a nomination of that Judge as an eligible Judge for the purposes of section 12 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004; and

any nomination by the Minister of a person holding an appointment referred to in subsection 219AB(1) of the Customs Act 1901, being a nomination that was in force immediately before the day of that repeal, is taken, with effect from that day, to be a nomination of that person for the purposes of section 13 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004.