Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives
492 Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives
If, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, it is relevant to prove a person’s state of mind about a particular act or omission, it is enough to show—
the act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and
the representative had the state of mind.
An act or omission done or omitted to be done for a person by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority is taken, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, to have been done or omitted to be done also by the person, unless the person proves the person took all reasonable steps to prevent the acts or omissions.
If—
an individual is convicted of an offence against this Act; and
the individual would not have been convicted of the offence if subsections (1) and (2) had not been enacted;
the individual is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for the offence.
In this section—representative, of a person, means—
if the person is a corporation—
an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; and
if, under the Corporations Act, the corporation (the parent corporation) controls another corporation or another corporation is a subsidiary of the parent corporation—
the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and
an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
if the person is an individual—an employee or agent of the individual.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandum
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.