Reviews
15 Reviews
If—
the holder of a route service licence is dissatisfied with—
a decision of the Minister with respect to the variation, or proposed variation, of a condition of the licence under section 8(5); or
a decision of the Minister on an application for a variation of a condition of the licence under section 8(6); or
a decision of the Minister refusing consent to a dealing with the licence under section 10(1); or
a decision of the Minister refusing consent to the surrender of the licence under section 14(1); or
a decision of the Minister to suspend or cancel the licence (other than a decision to cancel the licence in conjunction with the expiration of the period of the relevant declaration under Part 2); or
an existing operator within the meaning of section 12 is dissatisfied with a decision of the
Minister fixing the conditions of a service route licence offered to the existing operator under that section, the holder of the licence or the existing operator (as the case may be) may seek a review of the decision by the Tribunal under section 34 of the South Australian Civil and
Administrative Tribunal
Act 2013.
An application for a review must be made—
in the case of a review of a decision referred to in subsection (1)(b)—within 14 days after the applicant receives notice of the decision; or
in any other case—within 21 days after the applicant receives notice of the relevant decision, (or within such longer period as the Tribunal may allow).
The Minister must, if so required by a person affected by a decision of the Minister that is, or may be, the subject of a review by the
Tribunal, state in writing the reasons for the decision.
Except as provided by this section, a decision of the Minister under Part 2 or 3 is not subject to review or appeal in the Tribunal or any court.
Sign in to see bill, explanatory material, and regulations and instruments
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.