Rail Management Act 1996

If the Supreme Court is satisfied, on the application of a party to an access regime dispute in respect of which an independent panel has made a determination, that another party to that access regime dispute engaged, is engaging, or is proposing to engage in conduct that constitutes a contravention of the determination, the Court may make all or any of the following orders—

an order granting an injunction on such terms as the Court thinks appropriate—

restraining the other party from engaging in the conduct; or

if the conduct involves refusing or failing to do something—requiring the other party to do that thing;

an order directing the other party to compensate the applicant for loss or damage suffered as a result of the contravention;

any other order that the Court thinks appropriate.

If the Supreme Court has power under subsection (1) to grant an injunction restraining a person from engaging in particular conduct, or requiring a person to do anything, the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction) that it thinks appropriate against any other person who was involved in the contravention concerned.

A reference in this section to a person involved in the contravention is a reference to a person who has—

aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention; or

induced the contravention, whether through threats or promises or otherwise; or

been in any way (directly or indirectly) knowingly concerned in or a party to the contravention; or

conspired with others to effect the contravention.