Pre-sentence report must be ordered if child has or appears to have a relevant impairment
357 Pre-sentence report must be ordered if child has or appears to have a relevant impairment
If the appellate court finds a child guilty of an offence, before passing sentence, it must order the Secretary to prepare a pre-sentence report if—
the child has a relevant impairment; or
it appears to the appellate court that the child has a relevant impairment.
Despite subsection (1), the appellate court may determine not to order the Secretary to prepare a pre-sentence report if—
a pre-sentence report was prepared in respect of the child not more than 6 months earlier and—
the appellate court considers that a new pre-sentence report is unnecessary; and
the child consents to the use of that earlier pre-sentence report in determining the sentence to be imposed for the offence; or
the child has a relevant impairment and the appellate court is satisfied that a pre-sentence report is unnecessary; or
the appellate court is satisfied that it would not be in the interests of justice to order a pre-sentence report having regard to the following—
the timeliness of sentencing;
the likely length of any sentencing order;
whether the child is being held in custody or on remand;
other information or reports available to the appellate court that the court may take into account in determining what sentence to impose;
if assessment or diagnosis of the child is required, the time required to obtain that assessment or diagnosis.
If the appellate court determines not to order a pre-sentence report under subsection (2)(a), the appellate court may take into account the previous pre-sentence report in determining what sentence to impose on the child for the offence.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandumSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.