Highways (Liability for Straying Animals) Act 1983

Subject to subsection (2), so much of the rules of the common law relating to liability in tort for negligence as excludes or restricts the duty which a person might owe to others to take such care as is reasonable to see that damage is not caused by animals straying on to a highway does not form part, and shall be deemed never to have formed part, of the law of Western Australia.

Subsection (1) has no operation in relation to —

any action in respect of which a court has given judgment before the coming into operation of this Act; or

any appeal relating to the matters which were in issue in the action referred to in paragraph (a).

A court shall determine the liability in tort of a person for damage caused by animals straying on to a highway solely according to the law of Western Australia relating to liability in tort for —

negligence; or

intentional acts or omissions.

In determining according to the law of Western Australia relating to liability in tort for negligence whether or not a person is liable for damage caused by animals straying on to a particular highway, a court may consider, among other matters —

the general nature of the locality in which the relevant part of that highway is situated (in this subsection called the locality);

the nature and amount of traffic using that highway;

the extent to which users of that highway would expect to encounter animals on that highway and could be expected to guard against the risk associated with their presence;

the common practice in the locality in relation to —

fencing and the taking of other measures to prevent animals from straying on to highways in that locality; and

the taking of measures to warn users of that highway of the likely presence of animals thereon;

the cost of fencing, or of the taking of measures, referred to in paragraph (d) or of both, as the case requires.