Disciplinary action by SAT, alleging cause for
102 Disciplinary action by SAT, alleging cause for
The Commissioner may allege to the State Administrative Tribunal that —
there is proper cause for disciplinary action, as mentioned in section 103(2), against an agent; or
there is proper cause for disciplinary action, as mentioned in section 103(4), against a sales representative.
[(2)‑(5) deleted]
Notwithstanding the expiry of the certificate of registration of a sales representative, an allegation under subsection (1) in respect of a sales representative may be made to the State Administrative Tribunal not later than 12 months after the day on which his certificate of registration expired and, upon consideration of the allegation, the State Administrative Tribunal may exercise the powers conferred by section 103, other than the powers of suspension or cancellation of registration.
Despite the surrender by a person of a licence or triennial certificate or a licensee ceasing to be licensed or to hold a triennial certificate —
an allegation under subsection (1)(a) in respect of an agent may be made to the State Administrative Tribunal not later than 12 months after the day on which the licence or certificate was surrendered or the licensee ceased to be licensed or ceased holding the certificate; and
the State Administrative Tribunal may exercise the powers conferred by section 103, other than the power to suspend or cancel the agent’s licence or certificate.
[Section 102 amended: No. 74 of 1980 s. 10; No. 34 of 1998 s. 16; No. 55 of 2004 s. 1013 and 1020; No. 58 of 2010 s. 134; No. 25 of 2019 s. 55.]
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.