Refusal of authorisation
97 Refusal of authorisation
Without limiting section 96, the CEO may refuse to grant a passenger transport driver authorisation if —
the applicant is charged with a disqualification offence; or
the CEO is satisfied that the applicant is not a fit and proper person to be authorised to drive a vehicle for the purpose of transporting passengers for hire or reward.
The CEO must refuse to grant an authorisation if —
the applicant has been convicted of a disqualification offence; and
the conviction has not been quashed or set aside; and
the disqualification period prescribed for the purposes of section 118(1) in relation to the disqualification offence has not passed since the conviction.
Without limiting subsection (1)(b), in considering whether a person is a fit and proper person to hold a passenger transport driver authorisation, the CEO may have regard to —
the physical and mental fitness of the person; and
any approved medical report on the person required by the regulations; and
any other relevant matters.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandumSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.