Effect of decision under s. 88(a), (c) or (e)
89 Effect of decision under s. 88(a), (c) or (e)
If the Tribunal makes a decision referred to in section 88(a), (c) or (e) on a review application made in relation to a patient —
section 86 ceases to apply; and
if the request and assessment process in respect of the patient had not been completed when the review application was made — the request and assessment process can be resumed; and
if the request and assessment process in respect of the patient had been completed when the review application was made — the process under Part 4 can be resumed, and any step that is authorised under that Part can be taken, in relation to the patient; and
if the Tribunal sets aside the reviewed decision — subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies, as the case requires.
If the reviewed decision set aside by the Tribunal is a decision of a coordinating practitioner in a first assessment —
the Tribunal’s decision is substituted for the reviewed decision; and
if the outcome of the first assessment would, but for the reviewed decision, have been that the patient was assessed as eligible for access to voluntary assisted dying — the coordinating practitioner is taken to have made a first assessment assessing the patient as eligible for access to voluntary assisted dying.
If the reviewed decision set aside by the Tribunal is a decision of a consulting practitioner in a consulting assessment —
the Tribunal’s decision is substituted for the reviewed decision; and
if the outcome of the consulting assessment would, but for the reviewed decision, have been that the patient was assessed as eligible for access to voluntary assisted dying — the consulting practitioner is taken to have made a consulting assessment assessing the patient as eligible for access to voluntary assisted dying.
If the reviewed decision set aside by the Tribunal is a decision of a coordinating practitioner in a final review —
the Tribunal’s decision is substituted for the reviewed decision; and
the final review form is taken to include —
if the reviewed decision is a decision referred to in section 84(1)(c)(i) — a statement certifying that the coordinating practitioner is satisfied that the patient has decision‑making capacity in relation to voluntary assisted dying; or
if the reviewed decision is a decision referred to in section 84(1)(c)(ii) — a statement certifying that the coordinating practitioner is satisfied that the patient in requesting access to voluntary assisted dying is acting voluntarily and without coercion.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandumSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.