A Longman warning need not use the word 'dangerous' or 'danger' provided the trial judge makes clear to the jury what the danger is and why careful scrutiny of the complainant's evidence is required. The content and strength of the warning is dictated by the particular circumstances of the case, and there is no legal differentiation between a 'strong' warning and one that otherwise satisfies the requirements of the law. Trial judges should not speak at large about human experience regarding victims' reluctance to complain but should tie any such observations to the evidence in the case.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 23 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 23 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.