A delay of two and a half to three years in complaining of sexual offences against a child does not, of itself, require a Longman direction where the accused cannot demonstrate any forensic disadvantage from the delay. The s 36BD direction on delay in complaint is adequate where the jury are told delay is a matter for them to consider when assessing the complainant's credit, without a more specific direction on the significance of delay for the consistency of the complainant's evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 11 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.