Nelson v Quinn

[2001] WASCA 297

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentence
3. › Commonwealth offences
4. › Customs Act 1901 (Cth)
5. › Smuggling, evasion and false statements
6. › Whether appropriate to discharge without conviction
7. › Section 19B Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
8. › Relevance of consequences of conviction
9. › Whether extenuating circumstances established
10. › Whether financial consequences of conviction to be given significant weight
1. Appeal
2. › Appeal from Court of Petty Sessions
3. › Review of discretionary sentencing decision
4. › House v The King principles
5. › Whether Magistrate misapprehended principles or failed to take into account relevant circumstances
6. › Distinction between appeal and merits review under s 186(1)(b) Justices Act 1902 (WA)
7. › Admission of further evidence on appeal

Quick Take

The circumstances in which s 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) will be exercised in favour of a defendant convicted of Customs Act offences are rare and exceptional. Financial consequences of conviction flowing from foreign countries' immigration decisions are not to be given significant weight in the s 19B analysis, as it is for those countries to assess whether convictions should impede entry. The distinction between an appeal from a discretionary decision (requiring House v The King error) and a merits review under s 186(1)(b) of the Justices Act 1902 (WA) (triggered by materially relevant new evidence) was applied.