Where a managing director of a quasi-partnership company claims ownership of the company's core intellectual property (which was contributed to the company in exchange for shares), demands royalties, and threatens to terminate the company's licence, the other directors may dismiss the managing director without prior warning, and such dismissal does not constitute oppression under s 246AA of the Corporations Law. The conduct of the party alleging oppression in precipitating the breakdown of the corporate relationship is a critical factor in assessing whether the response was oppressive.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.