R v Mercieca

[2004] VSCA 170

Victorian Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentence
3. › Parity in sentencing
4. › Co-offenders sentenced by different judges at different times
5. › Whether disparity or lack of disparity in sentences engendered justifiable sense of grievance
6. › Early plea of guilty as mitigating factor not reflected in comparative sentences
7. › Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentence
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Manifest excess
5. › Whether sentences manifestly excessive having regard to co-offenders' sentences and early plea of guilty
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentence
3. › Licence cancellation and suspension
4. › Whether sentencing judge bound to cancel licence
5. › Discretion to suspend licence under s 89(4)(a)
6. › Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s 89(4)(a)

Quick Take

Where an offender pleads guilty early and is sentenced well before co-offenders, the parity principle requires that the early plea be reflected as a mitigating factor in the comparative sentences. A lack of disparity between the sentences of an early-pleading offender and later-pleading co-offenders with more charges can bespeak error. The sentencing judge has discretion under s 89(4)(a) of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) to suspend rather than cancel a driver's licence.