A court will not recall published reasons merely because a party failed to present its argument as well as it might have been put, or because it now wishes to re-agitate arguments already considered. The applicant must demonstrate that the court proceeded on a misapprehension of fact or law not attributable solely to the applicant's neglect or default. The Court of Appeal's power under s 75A(10) and UCPR r 51.52 permits refinement of issues on appeal and the grant of narrower relief within the scope of the pleadings, even where the primary claim fails.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.