Evidence that an accused possessed a weapon and ammunition of the same kind as used in a murder is admissible as circumstantial evidence even where the weapon was found years after the offence and in a different state, provided there is a basis to infer the accused had access to such items at the relevant time. The Crown is not required to adduce evidence of the number of people who might have had access to such weapons; that goes to weight, not admissibility. Evidence of other firearms not of the same kind as the murder weapon is inadmissible propensity evidence, but its admission may not cause a miscarriage of justice where the reference was fleeting, strong propensity warnings were given, and no objection was taken.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.