The M v The Queen test for unreasonable verdicts was applied in a case involving evidence given through an interpreter with acknowledged difficulties, inconsistencies in prosecution evidence, and the complainant's failure to report the incident to police. These factors did not render the verdict unreasonable where the complainant's evidence was substantially corroborated by an independent witness and the jury had the benefit of comprehensive addresses identifying the inconsistencies.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.