Cross-examination on compliance with an order to produce is limited to whether there has been complete compliance; it does not extend to broader forensic inquiries about the subject matter of the documents produced. Juror evidence about how a jury might have reacted to undisclosed evidence is inadmissible and irrelevant on a fresh evidence appeal ground, as the appellate court must make its own assessment of the evidence's potential impact on the verdict.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.