Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Thirkell v Cox [2010] NSWSC 99 — Family & House Was Dependant On — Barrister AI

Thirkell v Cox

[2010] NSWSC 99

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Family
1. Provision. Claim by step-daughter. Short period of dependency. Held that
1. plaintiff who lived with her father in the deceased's
1. house was dependant on

Case Details

Citation[2010] NSWSC 99

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2014Southern Cross Autoglass Pty Limited v Protector Glass Industries Pty LtdNSWSC 261

Relies on11

2005Sherborne Estate: [1] Vanvalen and Anor v Neaves and Anor; [2] Gilroy v Neaves and AnorNSWSC 593
2005Simons v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd: Estate D. HakimNSWSC 223
2005O'Dea & Anor v O'Dea: Estate Phyllis L.M. O'DeaNSWSC 46
2003Macewan Shaw v ShawVSC 318
and 7 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works