Evidence of a complainant's alleged false statements about a sexual relationship with another person, made months after the charged offences, does not satisfy the temporal or circumstantial connection requirements of s 293(4)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW). Similarities between the content of allegations (e.g., both involving older men in authority) do not establish a 'connected set of circumstances' — the connection must relate to the narrative of events surrounding the offence, not merely to the character of the allegations. The bench was divided on whether the proviso would have applied had the evidence been wrongly excluded.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.
10 of the 15 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.