A Robinson direction is not required where the trial judge has adequately drawn the jury's attention to the important inconsistencies in a child complainant's evidence and repeatedly directed that the jury must be satisfied the complainant was both honest and accurate. Where inconsistencies are plain for the jury to see, hear and appreciate, there is no need to identify every inconsistency. When comparing sentences for child sexual offences, comparable cases involving guilty pleas must be understood in that light, as a timely guilty plea is an especially significant mitigating feature in cases of this kind.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.