Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Hc [2017] ACTSC 276 — Evidence — Barrister AI

R v Hc

[2017] ACTSC 276

Supreme Court of the ACT30 August 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
2. › Evidentiary Matters Relating to Witnesses and Accused Persons
3. › application for exclusion of recorded statement by complainant
4. › alleged failure to comply with the requirement that the recorded statement be conducted ‘as soon as practicable after the event’
5. › taking of evidence in sexual, violent and family violence proceedings
6. › hearsay
7. › audiovisual recording
8. › requirements under Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1991 (ACT)

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 276

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date30 August 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by5

2024Mena v DPPACTCA 34
2024de Souza v DPPACTSC 330
2024DPP v Ivanisevic (No 3)ACTSC 24
2023Stubbings v RNSWCCA 69
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on14

2017R v Al-Harazi (No 6)ACTSC 63
2016The Director of Public Prosecutions v ScheeleACTCA 23
2013Semaan v PoidevinNSWSC 226
2012Geldert v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 226
and 10 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works