Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Saba v Plumb & Anor [2017] NSWSC 955 — Party/Party — Barrister AI

Saba v Plumb & Anor

[2017] NSWSC 955

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Costs
2. › Party/Party
3. › Bases of quantification
4. › Indemnity basis
5. › Application by Defendants for indemnity costs
6. › whether Plaintiff alleged fraud unnecessarily and without notice
7. › whether Plaintiff’s claims lacked a proper basis
8. › whether Plaintiff’s issue of subpoenas and notices to produce caused undue costs
9. › whether Plaintiff’s evidence and cross-examination excessively broad in scope
1. Costs
2. › Party/Party
3. › Application for gross sum costs order
4. › where Court lacks requisite evidence to quantify costs in gross sum
5. › where hearing on gross sum may incur further wasted costs

Case Details

Citation[2017] NSWSC 955

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 15 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by15

2026In the matter of Commonwealth Securities LtdNSWSC 1118
2025In the matter of Bayfoyle Pty LtdNSWSC 1607
2024Bao v Li (No 3)NSWSC 162
2022Kalloghlian v Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd (No 3)NSWSC 1201
and 11 more after sign-in

Relies on17

2017In the matter of Australasian Barrister Chambers Pty Ltd (in liquidation)NSWSC 695
2017Saba v Plumb & AnorNSWSC 622
2013Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4)NSWSC 811
2013Cabport Pty Ltd v Marinchek (No 2)NSWCA 131
and 13 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works