A juror's introduction of internet-sourced legal material into the jury room is an irregularity, but will not result in a miscarriage of justice where the material is not substantively wrong and any deficiency is cured by the trial judge's oral and written directions. The test remains whether the jury would have returned the same verdict had the irregularity not occurred.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.