A demonstrated intention to return stolen property — evidenced by concrete steps taken within 24 hours, not merely an empty aspiration — is a powerful mitigating factor that may reduce the significance of general deterrence and make suspension of a sentence of imprisonment appropriate, even where the amount stolen is very large. General deterrence carries less weight in opportunistic stealing than in cases involving abuse of a position of trust.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
5 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.