The test for whether a servient owner's proposed works substantially interfere with a right of carriageway does not involve balancing the servient owner's desire for access against the dominant owner's rights; and the necessity of proposed works to the dominant owner exercising rights of carriageway is relevant but not decisive of whether the works unreasonably interfere with the servient owner's rights.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 16 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 16 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.