The absence of a warning not to place undue weight on replayed evidence does not result in a miscarriage of justice where the replayed evidence is a short excerpt played at the jury's request together with relevant cross-examination, and there is no countervailing sworn testimony from the accused. Verdicts of conviction on some counts and acquittal on others are not inconsistent where the differing outcomes are explicable by differences in the evidence, including qualified admissions by the accused on the counts of conviction.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.