An appellate challenge to a primary judge's evaluative findings of fact will not succeed by attacking minor or minute aspects of careful reasoning in non-dispositive parts of the judgment; only a fundamental misunderstanding of the evidence or significant overlooked evidence could warrant a retrial.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.