DNA evidence found on a complainant's clothing is not necessarily an indispensable link in a circumstantial case requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt of direct transfer, where other evidence (witness testimony, possession of complainant's property, general description) is independently capable of supporting a conviction. A trial judge's direction that DNA evidence alone is insufficient and is 'ambiguous' without supporting witness testimony adequately addresses the risk of improper reasoning. A sentence of 8 years 6 months' imprisonment (on a 20-year maximum) for aggravated sexual penetration involving a knife, death threats, and a highly vulnerable intoxicated victim is within the discretionary range, even where the offender was young, of prior good character, and had rehabilitated over a 12-year delay.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.