› alleged oral contracts between franchisee and franchisor
› whether applicants’ evidence concerning disputed conversations should be accepted
› application dismissed
Evidence
› where all witnesses who gave evidence of conversations did so in indirect speech, except on the rare occasions where the witness gave evidence of a verbatim recollection of the words actually used
› reasoning of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wild v Meduri considered
Case Details
Citation[2024] FCA 1265
CourtFCA
JurisdictionCommonwealth
Decision Date1 November 2024
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.