Chiodo Corporation Operations Pty Ltd v Douglas Shire Council

• 1. Appeal
  2. › Leave to appeal
  3. › Planning and Environment Court
  4. › Queensland
  5. › Error or mistake in law
  6. › Whether alleged errors materially affected the decision
  7. › Planning and Environment Court Act 2016 (Qld), s 63
• 1. Environment and Planning
  2. › Planning controls
  3. › Queensland
  4. › Local planning instrument
  5. › Assessment benchmarks
  6. › Performance outcomes and overall outcomes
  7. › Whether primary judge conflated consideration of separate assessment criteria
  8. › Planning Act 2016 (Qld), s 45
• 1. Environment and Planning
  2. › Planning controls
  3. › Queensland
  4. › Construction of planning schemes
  5. › Whether line of authority establishes discrete principle that provisions not to be construed 'too strictly'
  6. › Whether planning provisions to be read subject to qualification 'to an acceptable degree'
• 1. Courts and Tribunals with Environment Jurisdiction
  2. › Queensland
  3. › Planning and Environment Court
  4. › Duty to give reasons for decision
  5. › Whether reasons disclosed separate consideration of relevant criteria

Quick Take