Certain uses not alone sufficient to suggest sponsorship or sponsorship‑like support

Current

(1)

To avoid doubt, for the purposes of this Chapter, the use of a protected olympic expression for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision of information or for the purposes of criticism or review is not alone sufficient to suggest a sponsorship, or the provision of sponsorship‑like support, for the purposes of paragraph 30(2)(c) or (3)(c).

(2)

In subsection (1):

(a)

a reference to the provision of information includes a reference to the reporting of news and the presentation of current affairs; and

(b)

a reference to criticism or review includes a reference to criticism or review:

(i)

in a newspaper, magazine or similar periodical; or

(ii)

in a broadcast; or

(iii)

on the internet; or

(iv)

in a video recording or a film.

This Act’s bill:Second reading speech

Research tools for this sectionSubscription

Cited by Analyse Interrogate History Equivalents

The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.

35 Certain uses not alone sufficient to suggest sponsorship or sponsorship‑like support