Exclusion of acts of terrorism from claims against Nominal Defendant

Current

(1)

There is no right of action against the Nominal Defendant under section 2.29, 2.30 or 2.32 for damages that are attributable to an act that, having regard to the nature of the act and the context in which the act was done, it is reasonable to characterise as an act of terrorism.

(2)

An act cannot be characterised as an act of terrorism for the purposes of this section unless it can be so characterised under section 2.10 (2).

(3)

This section is repealed on a date to be appointed by proclamation for the purposes of this section.

This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandum Second reading speech

Research tools for this sectionSubscription

Cited by Analyse Interrogate History Equivalents

The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.

2.33 Exclusion of acts of terrorism from claims against Nominal Defendant