When review must occur
29 When review must occur
If it is brought to the attention of the Director that:
(a) an internet gaming key employee licence was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation;
(b) an internet gaming key licensee has been found guilty of an offence:
against the Act or these Regulations;
involving dishonesty;
involving the use, manufacture or sale of drugs; or
(iv) punishable on conviction by a maximum penalty of not less than 3 months imprisonment;
(c) an internet gaming key licensee has contravened a term or condition of his or her licence, a direction of the Director or a procedure or control specified in the approved control system;
(d) an internet gaming key licensee failed to provide information that he or she is required to provide under these Regulations or provided information knowing it to be false or misleading;
(e) an internet gaming key licensee has become bankrupt, applied to take the benefit of a law relating to bankrupt or insolvent debtors, has compounded with his or her creditors or made an assignment of his or her remuneration for their benefit; or
(f) the holder of an internet gaming key employee licence may not be a fit and proper person to hold the licence,
the Director must as soon as practicable conduct a review to investigate the matter.
(2) Despite subregulation (1) and regulation 34, the Director may determine that, having regard to the minor nature of the matter referred to in subregulation (1) that has been brought to his or her attention:
(a) a review need not be commenced or continued in relation to the matter; or
(b) the review is to be determined by reprimanding the holder of the licence to which the matter relates.
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.