Review procedure
33 Review procedure
(1) Subject to this Division, the procedure of a review is as determined by the Director.
Despite subregulation (1), the Director:
is not bound by the rules of evidence;
must act without regard to technicalities and legal form;
(c) may inform himself or herself about a relevant matter in the manner he or she thinks fit;
(d) may require the production of a relevant document, must inspect a relevant document produced before him or her, may retain the document for a reasonable period for the purposes of the review and make copies of it;
(e) may require a person, other than the internet gaming key licensee, who has an association with the subject of the review to attend before him or her and to answer truthfully questions put to that person; and
(f) may determine the review although the internet gaming key licensee has failed to make submissions within the time allowed, if the Director is satisfied that the licensee had received notice to do so.
(3) A person must comply with and not contravene a requirement under subregulation (2).
Maximum penalty: 15 penalty units.
(4) Despite subregulation (3), a person is not required to answer a question if the answer might tend to incriminate the person.
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.