1Short title
This Act may be cited as the Sexual Offences (Evidence and
Procedure) Act 1983.
Bills and explanatory statements from legislation.nt.gov.au; second reading speeches from the NT Parliamentary Record (Territory Stories). Links open the official source in a new tab.
Bill homepage (legislation.nt.gov.au)This Act may be cited as the Sexual Offences (Evidence and
Procedure) Act 1983.
This Act shall come into operation on the commencement of the
Criminal Code Act 1983.
In this Act:
complainant means a person on or against whom a sexual offence is alleged to have been committed.
defendant means a person charged with having committed a sexual offence.
examination of witnesses means an examination of witnesses in relation to a sexual offence, commenced after the commencement of this Act and taken under Part V of the Local Court (Criminal Procedure) Act 1928.
report means an account in writing or an account broadcast by wireless telegraphy in sound or in visual images.
sexual offence means an indictable offence involving:
sexual intercourse or sexual penetration; or
a sexual relationship; or
sexual abuse; or
indecent touching or an indecent assault; or
(e) any other indecent act directed against a person or committed in the presence of a child; or
(f) the making, collection, exhibition or display of an indecent object or indecent material; or
sexual servitude or any other form of sexual exploitation; or
(h) an attempt to commit, an act of procuring, or any other act preparatory to the commission of, any of the above.
trial means a trial of a defendant or a proceeding taken with a view to sentencing a defendant found guilty of a sexual offence which, in either case, is commenced after the commencement of this Act.
Note for section 3
The Interpretation Act 1978 contains definitions and other provisions that may be relevant to this Act.
This Act applies in addition to, and does not affect the operation of, the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011.
Part IIAA of the Criminal Code applies to an offence against this
Act.
Note for section 3AB
Part IIAA of the Criminal
Code states the general principles of criminal responsibility, establishes general defences, and deals with burden of proof. It also defines, or elaborates on, certain concepts commonly used in the creation of offences.
(1) If the charge of a sexual offence is to be dealt with summarily, the trial must be commenced within 3 months of the matter being first mentioned in court.
(2) If a person is charged with an indictable offence that is a sexual offence, a preliminary investigation under Part V, Division 1 of the Local Court (Criminal Procedure) Act 1928 must be commenced within 3 months of the matter being first mentioned in court.
(3) If the charge of a sexual offence is to be dealt with on indictment, the trial must be commenced within 3 months of the person being committed for trial.
(4) The court in which the person is to be tried, or which is to conduct a preliminary examination (as the case may be) may, if it thinks fit, at any time and despite that the period fixed by subsection (1), (2) or (3) (as the case may be) has expired, grant an extension, not exceeding 3 months, of the period.
More than one extension may be granted under subsection (4).
(1) In an examination of witnesses or a trial, whether or not it relates also to a charge of an offence other than a sexual offence against the same or another defendant, except with the leave of the court, evidence shall not be elicited or led, whether by examination in chief, cross-examination or re-examination, relating to:
the complainant's general reputation as to chastity; or
the complainant's sexual activities with any other person,
and the leave of the court shall not be granted unless the court is satisfied that the evidence sought to be elicited or led has substantial relevance to the facts in issue.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b), evidence that relates to or tends to establish the fact that the complainant was accustomed to engage in sexual activities with any other person, shall not be regarded:
(a) as having substantial relevance to the facts in issue by reason only of an inference it may raise as to general disposition; or
(b) as being proper matter for cross-examination as to credit, in the absence of special circumstances by reason of which it would be likely materially to impair the confidence in the reliability of the evidence of the complainant.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b), and without derogating from the relevance of other evidence in an examination of witnesses or a trial, evidence of an act or event that is substantially contemporaneous with an offence with which a defendant is charged, or that is part of a sequence of acts or events that explain the circumstances in which the alleged offence was committed, shall be regarded as having substantial relevance to the facts in issue.
(4) An application for leave of the court for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) shall be made in the absence of the jury, if any, and, if the defendant so requests, in the absence of the complainant, and shall be determined after the court has allowed such submissions or evidence, given on oath or otherwise, as it considers necessary for the determination of the application.
(5) On the trial of a person for a sexual offence or an assault with intent to commit such an offence:
(a) the Supreme Court Judge shall not warn, or suggest in any way to, the jury that it is unsafe to convict on the uncorroborated evidence of a complainant because the law regards complainants as an unreliable class of witness; and
where:
evidence is given; or
a question is asked of a witness; or
a statement is made in the course of an address on evidence,
which tends to suggest that there was delay in making a complaint about the alleged sexual offence, or alleged assault with intent to commit such an offence, by the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed, the Supreme Court Judge shall:
(iv) warn the jury that delay in complaining does not necessarily indicate that the allegation is false; and
(v) inform the jury that there may be good reasons why a victim of a sexual offence may hesitate in complaining about it.
(6) Nothing in subsection (5) prevents a judge from making any comment on evidence given in a trial that it is appropriate to make in the interests of justice.
In an examination of witnesses or a trial, a defendant who is not represented by a legal practitioner is not entitled to cross-examine the complainant directly.
The court must, as soon as practicable, explain to the defendant:
the prohibition against directly cross-examining the complainant and the effect of the prohibition; and
that if the defendant does not cross-examine the complainant, the defendant will not be permitted to adduce evidence in relation to a fact in issue in order to contradict the evidence of the complainant;
and
that the defendant can arrange for a legal practitioner to cross‑examine the complainant on the defendant's behalf; and
that the defendant must notify the court of the name of the arranged legal practitioner by a date specified by the court; and
that if the defendant does not wish to make such an arrangement, or if the defendant fails to notify the court of the name of a legal practitioner by the date specified:
the court will decide whether it is necessary in the interests of justice to appoint a legal practitioner to cross-examine the complainant for the defendant; and
if the court decides that it is necessary – the court may appoint a legal practitioner to cross-examine the complainant for the defendant, or make any other order the court considers necessary.
If the defendant does not wish to make such an arrangement, or if the defendant fails to notify the court of the name of a legal practitioner by the date specified:
the court must decide whether it is necessary in the interests of justice to appoint a legal practitioner to cross-examine the complainant for the defendant; and
if the court decides that it is necessary – the court may appoint a legal practitioner (the appointed person) to cross-examine the complainant for the defendant, or make any other order the court considers necessary.
If the defendant wishes to cross-examine the complainant, the defendant must put any question to the appointed person and the appointed person must put the question to the complainant, unless the appointed person considers the question to be improper.
Notes for subsection (4)
1 The appointed person need not use the exact same words as the defendant when putting a question.
2 The court can also rule that a question is improper and need not be answered – see section 41(2) of the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011.
3 See section 41(3) of the
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 for the meaning of
"improper question".
If the defendant does not give any instructions to an appointed person, the appointed person must act in the best interests of the defendant.
A person is not civilly or criminally liable for an act done or omitted to be done by the person in good faith as an appointed person for this section.
If a defendant cross-examines a complainant through an appointed person, the court must issue a warning to the jury (if any) to the effect that:
the procedure is a routine practice of the court; and
(b) no adverse inference is to be drawn against the defendant as a result of the use of the arrangement; and
(c) the evidence of the complainant is not to be given any greater or lesser weight because of the use of the arrangement.
A person commits an offence if:
(a) the person intentionally publishes or makes a statement or representation; and
(b) the publication or making of the statement or representation results in the disclosure of any of the following particulars at any time:
(i) the name, address, school or place of employment of a complainant;
(ii) any other particular likely to lead to the identification of a complainant; and
(c) the person is reckless in relation to the result referred to in paragraph (b).
Maximum penalty: 50 penalty units or imprisonment for 6 months.
(2) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) if:
(a) no proceeding in relation to the sexual offence that was alleged to have been committed is pending in a court when the statement or representation is published or made; and
(b) the affected complainant or, if there is more than one affected complainant, each affected complainant:
(i) consented in writing to the publication or making of the statement or representation before it was published or made; and
was an adult with capacity to consent when consenting.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a statement or representation exempted under section 8.
In this section:
affected complainant means a complainant whose particular referred to in subsection (1)(b) is disclosed as a result of the publication or making of the statement or representation.
capacity, for a person to consent, means the person:
is capable of freely and voluntarily consenting; and
(b) is not incapable of consenting because of mental impairment as defined in section 43A of the Criminal Code.
A person commits an offence if:
(a) the person intentionally publishes or makes a statement or representation; and
(b) the statement or representation is published or made before a defendant is committed for trial or sentence on a charge of having committed the sexual offence to which the statement or representation relates; and
(c) the publication or making of the statement or representation results in the disclosure of any of the following particulars:
the name, address, school or place of employment of a defendant;
(ii) any other particular likely to lead to the identification of the defendant; and
(d) the person is reckless in relation to the circumstance referred to in paragraph (b) and the result referred to in paragraph (c).
Maximum penalty: 40 penalty units or imprisonment for 6 months.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a statement or representation exempted under section 8.
(1) For sections 6(3) and 7(2), a statement or representation is exempted if it is published or made:
(a) in a report made verbatim of a judgment or decision delivered in a trial or an appeal proceeding arising from a trial and published in a recognised series of law reports; or
(b) in a report for or to any of the following entities for the purposes of the entity:
(i) the Agency primarily responsible for law and the administration of justice;
the Director of Public Prosecutions;
the Police Force of the Northern Territory;
(iv) an Agency primarily responsible for health, welfare and community services; or
(c) for an investigation into a complaint made by or on behalf of a complainant; or
(d) for the purposes of preparing for or conducting an examination of witnesses, a trial or an appeal proceeding arising from a trial; or
(e) in accordance with a court order or direction made under section 9.
(2) For section 7(2), a statement or representation is also exempted if:
(a) it is published or made in a report about an examination of witnesses that discloses any particular of a defendant referred to in section 7(1)(c) who, as a result of the examination, is committed for trial or sentence on a charge of having committed a sexual offence; and
it is published or made after the committal order is made; and
(c) it does not disclose any particular of any other defendant who is not committed.
Showing the first 12 of 26 provisions. See all provisions