Whether sterilisation is in child’s best interests
80D Whether sterilisation is in child’s best interests
The sterilisation of a child with an impairment is in the child’s best interests only if—
one or more of the following applies—
the sterilisation is medically necessary;
the child is, or is likely to be, sexually active and there is no method of contraception that could reasonably be expected to be successfully applied;
if the child is female—the child has problems with menstruation and cessation of menstruation by sterilisation is the only practicable way of overcoming the problems; and
the child’s impairment results in a substantial reduction of the child’s capacity for communication, social interaction and learning; and
the child’s impairment is, or is likely to be, permanent and there is a reasonable likelihood, when the child turns 18, the child will have impaired capacity for consenting to sterilisation; and
the sterilisation can not reasonably be postponed; and
the sterilisation is otherwise in the child’s best interests.
Sterilisation is not in the child’s best interests if the sterilisation is—
for eugenic reasons; or
to remove the risk of pregnancy resulting from sexual abuse.
In deciding whether the sterilisation is in the child’s best interests, the tribunal must—
ensure the child is treated in a way that respects the child’s dignity and privacy; and
do each of the following—
in a way that has regard to the child’s age and impairment, seek the child’s views and wishes and take them into account;
to the greatest extent practicable, seek the views of each of the following persons and take them into account—
any parent or guardian of the child;
if a parent or guardian is not the child’s primary carer, the child’s primary carer;
the child representative for the child;
take into account the information given by any health provider who is treating, or has treated, the child; and
take into account—
the wellbeing of the child; and
alternative forms of health care that have proven to be inadequate in relation to the child; and
alternative forms of health care that are available, or likely to become available, in the foreseeable future; and
the nature and extent of short-term, or long-term, significant risks associated with the proposed sterilisation and available alternative forms of health care.
The child’s views and wishes may be expressed in the following ways—
orally;
in writing;
in another way including, for example, by conduct.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandum
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.