Contrary to applicant’s best interests—healthcare information
51 Contrary to applicant’s best interests—healthcare information
If an access application is made to an agency or Minister for a document, the agency or Minister must decide to give access to the document unless disclosure would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest.
Despite schedule 3, section 12(2) and schedule 4, part 2, item 7, the Parliament considers it would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest to give access to a document to the extent it comprises relevant healthcare information of the applicant if the disclosure of the information might be prejudicial to the physical or mental health or wellbeing of the applicant.
Note—
Only a principal officer, Minister or appointed healthcare professional may decide whether disclosure might be prejudicial to the physical or mental health or wellbeing of the applicant—see sections 30(5) and 31(2).
However, despite an agency or Minister being able, under section 47(3)(d), to refuse access to all or part of a document, the agency or the Minister may decide to give access.
Notes—
1 Only a principal officer,
Minister or appointed healthcare professional may decide to give access under subsection (3)—see sections 30(5) and 31(2).
2 Also, relevant healthcare information to which access is refused may ultimately be disclosed to the applicant by the applicant’s nominated healthcare professional under section 77.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandumSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.