Grounds for amending, suspending or cancelling accreditations
38 Grounds for amending, suspending or cancelling accreditations
Each of the following is a ground for amending, suspending or cancelling an accreditation—
the accreditation was given in error;
the accreditation was obtained because of materially incorrect or misleading information or documents;
the holder of the accreditation is not an appropriate person to continue to hold the accreditation;Note—
For the holder of an accreditation that is a partnership, see also section 136.
it is not in the public interest for the holder of the accreditation to continue to hold the accreditation;
public safety has been endangered, or is likely to be endangered, because of the conduct of the following persons while carrying out activities under the accreditation—
the holder of the accreditation;
if the holder of the accreditation is a corporation— an executive officer of the corporation;
if the holder of the accreditation is a partnership— a partner in the partnership;
the holder of the accreditation has given false or misleading information to—
an authorised officer; or
an authorised officer under the Heavy Vehicle National Law (Queensland);
another ground prescribed by regulation.
Note—
See also section 15.
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.