Cross-examination of deponent
463 Cross-examination of deponent
A party seeking to cross-examine a deponent on an affidavit filed on behalf of an opposite party may serve on that opposite party a notice requiring the production of the deponent for cross-examination at the hearing of the proceeding.
The affidavit is not to be used as evidence unless – the deponent is produced according to the notice; or the Court or a judge makes an order under subrule (4) exempting the deponent from attending for cross-examination; or the Court or a judge grants special leave for its use.
A party served with a notice under subrule (1) may apply to the Court or a judge for an order exempting the deponent named in the notice from attending for cross-examination.
On an application under subrule (3), the Court or a judge may make an order exempting a deponent from attending for cross-examination if the deponent's attendance is not necessary in the interests of justice having regard to – the circumstances of the case; and the subject matter of the proceeding; and the cost of procuring the attendance of the deponent.
Unless the Court or a judge makes an order under subrule (4), the party on whom a notice under subrule (1) is served is entitled to compel the attendance of the deponent for cross-examination in the same way as that party may compel the attendance of a witness to be examined.
A party who produces a deponent for cross-examination is not entitled to demand the expenses of that attendance in the first instance from the party requiring the attendance.
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.