Decision on application for driver accreditation
55O Decision on application for driver accreditation
Safe Transport Victoria, having considered the matters referred to in section 55M, may issue a driver accreditation if satisfied—
that it is appropriate to do so having regard to the public care objective; and
that the applicant—
is technically competent and sufficiently fit and healthy to drive a bus for the purpose of providing a commercial bus service, a commercial minibus service or a local bus service; and
is a fit and proper person to provide a commercial bus service, a commercial minibus service or a local bus service; and
that the applicant has complied with the requirements under this Part in relation to the application, including paying the application fee (if any) determined by Safe Transport Victoria under section 71A.
However, Safe Transport Victoria must refuse to issue a driver accreditation if aware that the applicant—
does not hold an Australian driver licence; or
has been found guilty of a category 1 offence; or
is a person who is subject to—
S. 55O(2)(c)(i) amended by No. 28/2025 s. 39.
reporting obligations imposed under the Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004; or
a supervision order or interim supervision order within the meaning of the Serious Offenders Act 2018.
Unless satisfied that the applicant has shown that the issue of a driver accreditation is appropriate in the circumstances, Safe Transport Victoria must also refuse to issue a driver accreditation if aware that the applicant—
has been found guilty of a category 2 offence; or
is subject to a charge for a category 1 offence that has not been finally disposed of at the time of considering the application.
Without limiting the discretion of Safe Transport Victoria, Safe Transport Victoria may refuse to issue a driver accreditation if aware that the applicant—
has been found guilty of a category 3 offence; or
is subject to a charge for a category 2 offence or category 3 offence that has not been finally disposed of at the time of considering the application.
Safe Transport Victoria must not refuse to issue a driver accreditation on a ground referred to in subsection (2) if a decision to refuse to issue an accreditation or cancel an accreditation in respect of the person on that ground has previously been set aside (without being remitted) by VCAT.
In making a decision under subsection (3) or (4), Safe Transport Victoria may have regard to the following matters in relation to the category 2 offence or category 3 offence—
the nature and gravity of the offence and its relevance to the service to be provided by the applicant;
the period of time since the applicant committed the offence;
whether a finding of guilt or conviction was recorded;
the sentence imposed for the offence;
the age of the applicant when the offence was committed;
in relation to any sexual offence, the age of any victim;
whether or not the conduct that constituted the offence has been decriminalised since the offence was committed;
the applicant's behaviour since committing the offence;
the likelihood of the applicant committing another such offence in the future, in particular, any future threat to a child or other vulnerable person;
any information given by the applicant.
S. 55P inserted by No. 34/2023 s. 6.
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.