Role of Public Interest Monitor in relation to periodic reviews
4K Role of Public Interest Monitor in relation to periodic reviews
S. 4K inserted by No. 32/2018 s. 7.
A Public Interest Monitor is entitled—
to test the content and sufficiency of the information to be relied on for the purposes of conducting a periodic review; and
for the purpose of testing the content and sufficiency of the information to be relied on for the purposes of conducting a periodic review—
to ask questions of any of the following persons—
the authorised police officer who made the police detention decision;
the nominated senior police officer in relation to a periodic review they conduct;
a police officer exercising powers or performing duties under Part 2AA in relation to a person detained under that Part; and
to make submissions to the nominated senior police officer in relation to the conduct of a periodic review.
Note
A nominated senior police officer conducts periodic reviews under section 13AZZN.
Without limiting subsection (1), a Public Interest Monitor is entitled to make submissions to the nominated senior police officer in person or by telephone or electronic communication or any other reasonable way.
If a Public Interest Monitor is not reasonably able to be contacted before the nominated senior police officer conducts a periodic review—
the nominated senior police officer may conduct the periodic review, without a Public Interest Monitor being notified; and
a Public Interest Monitor must—
be notified as soon as practicable after the completion of the periodic review; and
be given any information requested by a Public Interest Monitor that the Public Interest Monitor would have been entitled to obtain for the purposes of exercising a power under subsection (1) or (2).
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.