Decisions about firearms prohibition orders
338 Decisions about firearms prohibition orders
The following provisions have effect in relation to a review by the Tribunal of a decision under Part 8 (an FPO decision) —
the decision‑maker cannot be requested under the SAT Act section 21(1) to provide a written statement of the reasons for an FPO decision;
the Tribunal cannot under the SAT Act section 22(3) order the decision‑maker to provide a statement of the reasons for an FPO decision;
the Tribunal cannot under the SAT Act section 25(2) make an order staying the operation of an FPO decision;
despite the SAT Act section 29(5)(b), an FPO decision as affirmed or varied by the Tribunal, or a decision that the Tribunal substitutes for an FPO decision, has effect from the date that the Tribunal affirms or varies the FPO decision or substitutes its decision for the FPO decision, as the case requires (and the Tribunal cannot order otherwise under the SAT Act section 29(5)(b)).
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandumSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.